Neutralized! Who? Me?

You mean I'm not a player anymore? This almost sounds like Alfred E. Neuman from Mad magazine and this is madness. Look at this short list,

1. I accept Mr. Obama’s words at face value as coming from a man of honor. Accepting things at face value is the mark of a person who
·
• Is naive
• is easily led astray
• who has no mind of their own,
• displays their ignorance and have not studied the concept
• as no strong belief system
• has no understanding of the nature of man ·
• has limited or no knowledge of what good and evil is and is liable to reverse them.
The founders of the Constitution were not these kind of men but it does describe a large segment of the population today. They are people who are easily neutralized, - continuing:
2. I want security rather than opportunity.
3. I am willing to sacrifice some freedom for the greater good of those who are less fortunate.
4. I have never read the words of the Constitution
5. I don’t know the definitions of socialism, tyranny, terrorism but I know it when I see it
6. I accept main steam media (MSM) as my main source of news (papers, TV/Radio networks)
7. My job depends more on how well I fit in with the views of other people and secondarily on my skills.
8. I have too many other things going on to worry about this.

Does it define you as one of those who has been neutralized in the fight?

Neutralized means that you have accepted at face value the idea that you do not have to take any action at this time to preserve your freedoms.

And yet your freedoms are very quickly being taken away. Note the current actions of Mr. Obama, many people believe his endorsements are sufficient to make things right, his popularity is sufficient to lead us all and that everything is in good hands.

Energized means that you wisely measure actions of the person against the Constitution as yardstick and you wisely look at the intent behind the words. Does that intent build and defend the Constitution?

So here we can draw a distinction between the two types of people that are in the United States. One group shows pure acceptance and wants to believe the slickest politician we have seen in these times. The other group is looking under the bed covers to see who is really there and measuring words, actions and intent against the Constitution and finding a lot of actions that are inconsistent with defending this nation and its Constitution.

In other places this is called looking at the fruits of their labor. The fruit of Labor or Action ALWAYS gives an indication of what the inner person is like. You cannot do works that are against your inner belief system, otherwise you are unstable and therefore we have an absolute standard by which we can judge somebody, just look at their works – in this case do they support the Constitution? Do they support the other things that constitute a true American? The answer is no in the case of most of our current elected officials.

Let me also say that distractors can neutralize you. Distractors are things that take your time and attention from reality. Dealing with distractors also means you have the time that you are spending elsewhere, you are making a choice about life, about freedom. Freedom is reality, digital distractions, diversions, and detours are things that have no lasting value¹ and neutralize you.

Are you going to change, are you going to join us? Are you going to help put this country back on track so that it is a constitutional country again?

‘Neutralized’ also means that you have bought the argument that only those who have been trained for a particular job can do it. We are told that those who are good and honest are qualified to do the job. I'd prefer someone who is honest, wise and has sound principles to get in and negotiate with other world leaders rather than one who is trained to the same level of understanding and willingness to negotiate away our sovereignty. I would prefer someone who stands by their morals, convictions, virtues because those are the people who have the vision and are willing to defend the Constitution rather than give away or compromise our constitutional principles. That does not mean given two people equally honest , good and one is more experienced in a job that I would ignore that experience. It does mean that I would choose the honest and good man above the experience. How do I know who that is? I look at their works and my standard is the Constitution, results of living their religion, and demonstrated knowledge on the character of Man. The same stuff the founders depended on.

If you are neutralized you are no longer effective in maintaining constitutional principles, you have gone over to the dark side – socialism, nationalism, communism, any other ‘ism’ that is not American Constitutionalism.

It's time to raise your hand and point at people and say you're a victim, you're a victim of being lead too easily, a victim of mass marketing, a victim of Obama's charm, we need a new word to indicate what is actually happening to them. So tell them they have been NEUTRALIZED! Then tell them that it can be changed, it is entirely within their capability to not be a victim.